PDA

View Full Version : That girl from the National Geographic cover...


grassshoppah
14th March 2002, 07:59 AM
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - For nearly two decades, National Geographic has been flooded with requests for information about a beautiful Afghan teen-ager with piercing green eyes whose cover image became one of its most recognised photographs.


But the woman's identity has only just been uncovered after the National Geographic photographer who first saw her in a refugee camp in Pakistan 18 years ago, finally tracked down the woman in a remote village south of Jalalabad, Afghanistan.


"Every time I went there (to Afghanistan or Pakistan), I asked about her, but I never had any leads," freelance photographer Steve McCurry, who took the picture for National Geographic in 1984, told Reuters.


McCurry says hardly a day has gone by that people have not asked him about the young woman, whose name he did not take down when he took her picture for the January 1985 cover of National Geographic.


This January, he returned with a National Geographic team to the Nasir Bagh refugee camp in Pakistan where he took the picture and found someone who said he grew up with the woman's brother.


"The refugee camp was set to close and so I knew this was my only chance to find her," said McCurry. "I couldn't believe it when the brother finally turned up with his sister. I knew immediately it was her."


The woman, who is now about 30 years old, was identified as Sharbat Gula. She remembered McCurry taking the picture but had never seen a copy of it and was surprised and embarrassed by all the attention it attracted.


Gula got married shortly after McCurry first saw her and had four daughters, one of whom died in infancy. She was repatriated from the camp in 1992 and returned to Afghanistan with her family.


Her life had been tough in Afghanistan and McCurry said she had struggled to survive.


"What the second picture shows is that she is still alive and survived quite well in fact ... but that pain and hardship is still written in her face. It is not a face of joy," he added.


NEW PHOTOS TAKEN


A conservative Pashtun, Gula sought her husband's permission to lift her veil to show her face for the latest photographs, which appear in National Geographic's April edition.


McCurry said he saw Gula as a representative of the plight of the Afghan people, who endured an extended war with the Soviet Union and the rise and fall of the Taliban.


"She's really emblematic of the Afghan spirit," he said, adding that a education fund had been set up by National Geographic for young Afghan girls.


National Geographic used several scientific methods to ensure they had found the right woman, including iris recognition in which the coloured portion of the eye is examined.


No two human irises are the same and a direct match holds a near 100 percent probability of authenticity, National Geographic said. The woman's eyes were found to be a perfect match.

http://eur.news1.yimg.com/eur.yimg.com/xp/reuters_ids/20020313/i/3758931998.jpg

neon
14th March 2002, 08:05 AM
WOW!! :eek:
the face is definitely very worn, but those eyes...

Busaras
14th March 2002, 08:06 AM
such a famous cover... read around christmas that he was trying to locate her ok....

grassshoppah
14th March 2002, 08:16 AM
Yeah....she definitely looks like she's had a hard life....

Sammag
14th March 2002, 09:18 AM
That earlier photo of her, I find a tad disturbing, she looks possessed.

superfly
14th March 2002, 09:36 AM
seen this in the herald last night

Beano2
14th March 2002, 09:37 AM
They look more like oil paintings than photos. Strange.

blastman
14th March 2002, 09:50 AM
You can definitely see she had a hard life, but those eyes...!

grassshoppah
14th March 2002, 09:55 AM
Originally posted by Sammag
That earlier photo of her, I find a tad disturbing, she looks possessed.

I think she looks so beautiful in the younger picture....sounds horrible but I would have thought she would have grown into an absolutely stunning woman.....

oldster
14th March 2002, 10:19 AM
Those eyes seem to follow you all around your conscience.

oldster
14th March 2002, 10:23 AM
Originally posted by grassshoppah


I think she looks so beautiful in the younger picture....sounds horrible but I would have thought she would have grown into an absolutely stunning woman.....
Take a good look at the picture on the right. All the ingredients for a radiant beauty are there. They have been dulled by circumstances.

Elimare
14th March 2002, 10:26 AM
Her nose is a different shape.. looks longer and pointier...

Rowche Rumbler
14th March 2002, 10:28 AM
Originally posted by oldster
Take a good look at the picture on the right. All the ingredients for a radiant beauty are there. They have been dulled by circumstances.

very eloquent, hats off to you sir

Zenith
14th March 2002, 10:28 AM
So she's only 12 in that first pic?

Drifter2
14th March 2002, 10:29 AM
Saw these pictures on the front page of The Examiner this morning and thought the accompanying article about "her face being marked by the ravages of war" was a load of bollocks.

1. She's FIFTEEN years older for Christ's sake.
2. She is still a fine looking woman imho. Remember she probably isn't wearing any makeup.
3. How would your face look after a few years suffocating under a burka?

blastman
14th March 2002, 10:29 AM
Originally posted by ro_G


very eloquent, hats off to you sir

Yeah, where are you reading that from, oldster? :D

grassshoppah
14th March 2002, 10:32 AM
FFS I know she's had a hard life....I did read what I posted......all I'm saying is based on the younger picture I would have thought she would be have been this absolutely stunning woman.....circumstances or not.......

Zenith
14th March 2002, 10:36 AM
Originally posted by Zenith
So she's only 12 in that first pic?

Oops, sorry, didn't read the original post carefully enough. 15 makes much more sense.

oldster
14th March 2002, 10:36 AM
Originally posted by blastman


Yeah, where are you reading that from, oldster? :D
The inside of my skull, scarily enough! Sometimes I pick the odd pearl from out the mire of my mind.

Drifter2
14th March 2002, 10:44 AM
Originally posted by grassshoppah
FFS I know she's had a hard life....I did read what I posted......all I'm saying is based on the younger picture I would have thought she would be have been this absolutely stunning woman.....circumstances or not.......
I meant the article in The Examiner was a load of bollocks. Basically, it went on about what a shame it was that she looks like such an old dog after the hard life she's had.

Take that horrible yoke off her head, take her to Peter Marks, get her a makeup artist and you've got model material.

Zenith
14th March 2002, 10:47 AM
Ah now, lets not get ahead of ourselves.

grassshoppah
14th March 2002, 10:48 AM
Originally posted by Drifter

I meant the article in The Examiner was a load of bollocks. Basically, it went on about what a shame it was that she looks like such an old dog after the hard life she's had.

Take that horrible yoke off her head, take her to Peter Marks, get her a makeup artist and you've got model material.


Ah right.


Yeah, you're probably right...

Elimare
14th March 2002, 10:50 AM
Donīt think she looks any worse than any of the Eastenders ībeautiesī ;)

Just think of Pauline Fowler... :D

Drifter2
14th March 2002, 10:59 AM
Originally posted by Zenith
Ah now, lets not get ahead of ourselves.
Maybe so. I'll reserve judgement until I see the photos in the National Geographic. The pics in the link are very poor quality.

grassshoppah
14th March 2002, 11:10 AM
Originally posted by Elimare


Just think of Pauline Fowler... :D

That woman has yellow skin.....